Moreover, PGAs rank among

promiscuous enzymes because

Moreover, PGAs rank among

promiscuous enzymes because check details they also catalyze reactions such as trans-esterification, Markovnikov addition or Henry reaction. This particular biocatalytic versatility represents a driving force for the discovery of novel members of this enzyme family and further research into the catalytic potential of PGAs. This review deals with biocatalytic applications exploiting enantioselectivity and promiscuity of prokaryotic PGAs that have been recently reported. Biocatalytic applications are discussed and presented with reaction substrates converted into active compounds useful for the pharmaceutical industry. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.”
“Protein phosphatases are believed to coordinate with kinases to execute biological functions, but examples of such integrated activities, however, are still missing. In this report, we have identified protein tyrosine

phosphatase H1 (PTPH1) as a specific phosphatase for p38 gamma mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and shown their cooperative oncogenic activity through direct binding. p38 gamma, a Ras effector known to act independent of its phosphorylation, was first shown to require its unique PDZ-binding motif to increase Ras transformation. Yeast two-hybrid screening and in vitro and in vivo analyses further identified PTPH1 as a specific p38 gamma phosphatase VX-770 datasheet through PDZ-mediated binding. Additional experiments showed that PTPH1 itself plays a role in Ras-dependent

malignant growth in vitro and/or in mice by a mechanism depending CA4P in vivo on its p38 gamma-binding activity. Moreover, Ras increases both p38 gamma and PTPH1 protein expression and there is a coupling of increased p38 gamma and PTPH1 protein expression in primary colon cancer tissues. These results reveal a coordinative oncogenic activity of a MAPK with its specific phosphatase and suggest that PDZ-mediated p38 gamma/PTPH1 complex may be a novel target for Ras-dependent malignancies. Cancer Res; 70(7); 2901-10. (C) 2010 AACR.”
“OBJECTIVE: We define magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical criteria that differentiate radiation effect (RE) from tumor progression after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).\n\nMETHODS: We correlated postoperative imaging and histopathological data in 68 patients who underwent delayed resection of a brain metastasis after SRS. Surgical resection was required in these patients because of clinical and imaging evidence of lesion progression 0.3 to 27.7 months after SRS. At the time of SRS, the median target volume was 7.1 mL (range, 0.5-26 mL), which increased to 14 mL (range, 1.3-81 mL) at the time of surgery. After initial SRS, routine contrast-enhanced MRI was used to assess tumor response and to detect potential adverse radiation effects. We retrospectively correlated these serial MRIs with the postoperative histopathology to determine if any routine MRI features might differentiate tumor progression from RE.

Comments are closed.